<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why you should use caching for WordPress blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rackerhacker.com/2007/12/06/why-you-should-use-caching-for-wordpress-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rackerhacker.com/2007/12/06/why-you-should-use-caching-for-wordpress-blogs/</link>
	<description>Words of wisdom from a server administrator</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: xxclixxx</title>
		<link>http://rackerhacker.com/2007/12/06/why-you-should-use-caching-for-wordpress-blogs/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>xxclixxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rackerhacker.com/2007/12/06/why-you-should-use-caching-for-wordpress-blogs/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>WP Cache is great. That in combination with APC is even greater. With APC I've reduced the number of hard drive accesses by 45/second. You can also do some memcache like things, so I cut back on some queries too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WP Cache is great. That in combination with APC is even greater. With APC I&#8217;ve reduced the number of hard drive accesses by 45/second. You can also do some memcache like things, so I cut back on some queries too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
