<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySQL Replication: Delayed Slaves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rackerhacker.com/2008/01/08/mysql-replication-delayed-slaves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rackerhacker.com/2008/01/08/mysql-replication-delayed-slaves/</link>
	<description>Words of wisdom from a server administrator</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Racker Hacker » Database » MySQL Replication: Slave Performance</title>
		<link>http://rackerhacker.com/2008/01/08/mysql-replication-delayed-slaves/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Racker Hacker » Database » MySQL Replication: Slave Performance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rackerhacker.com/2008/01/08/mysql-replication-delayed-slaves/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>[...] in mind, however, that the last two options will increase slave performance, but it may cause them to lag behind the master. Depending on your application, this may not be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in mind, however, that the last two options will increase slave performance, but it may cause them to lag behind the master. Depending on your application, this may not be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
