<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reduce disk I/O for small reads using memory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rackerhacker.com/2008/08/07/reduce-disk-io-for-small-reads-using-memory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rackerhacker.com/2008/08/07/reduce-disk-io-for-small-reads-using-memory/</link>
	<description>Words of wisdom from a server administrator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:07:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debian tuning for increasing read/write buffer.</title>
		<link>http://rackerhacker.com/2008/08/07/reduce-disk-io-for-small-reads-using-memory/#comment-16832</link>
		<dc:creator>Debian tuning for increasing read/write buffer.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rackerhacker.com/?p=316#comment-16832</guid>
		<description>[...] I doubt prodding any of it will help if the problem is just that more RAM is needed, but &#8220;dirty ratio&#8221; might be worth tweaking to help batch up multiple small writes. See also this tale of performance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I doubt prodding any of it will help if the problem is just that more RAM is needed, but &#8220;dirty ratio&#8221; might be worth tweaking to help batch up multiple small writes. See also this tale of performance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Hayden</title>
		<link>http://rackerhacker.com/2008/08/07/reduce-disk-io-for-small-reads-using-memory/#comment-16568</link>
		<dc:creator>Major Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rackerhacker.com/?p=316#comment-16568</guid>
		<description>Ramon -

I know that Ubuntu 10.04 uses grub 2, but XenServer 5.5 doesn&#039;t support grub 2.  There are a few guides on there about some workarounds to get it working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ramon -</p>
<p>I know that Ubuntu 10.04 uses grub 2, but XenServer 5.5 doesn't support grub 2.  There are a few guides on there about some workarounds to get it working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon</title>
		<link>http://rackerhacker.com/2008/08/07/reduce-disk-io-for-small-reads-using-memory/#comment-16550</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rackerhacker.com/?p=316#comment-16550</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this useful post. Do you have any experience with kernel 2.6 and Citrix XenServer? Myself and a many more people on the Citrix XenServer forum have problems with Ubuntu 10.04 (2.6.32-23-server #37-Ubuntu SMP) and there is no idea to have a right host (dom0) configuration. If you have an idea please contact me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this useful post. Do you have any experience with kernel 2.6 and Citrix XenServer? Myself and a many more people on the Citrix XenServer forum have problems with Ubuntu 10.04 (2.6.32-23-server #37-Ubuntu SMP) and there is no idea to have a right host (dom0) configuration. If you have an idea please contact me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flushing Cache to Disk under Linux &#171; *nix Shell</title>
		<link>http://rackerhacker.com/2008/08/07/reduce-disk-io-for-small-reads-using-memory/#comment-15573</link>
		<dc:creator>Flushing Cache to Disk under Linux &#171; *nix Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rackerhacker.com/?p=316#comment-15573</guid>
		<description>[...] such as this [westnet.com] and especially this [kerneltrap] on Page Cacheing and pdflush, but RackerHacker (although the title says &#8220;reads&#8221;, it really seems to address lots of small writes) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such as this [westnet.com] and especially this [kerneltrap] on Page Cacheing and pdflush, but RackerHacker (although the title says &#8220;reads&#8221;, it really seems to address lots of small writes) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

