Comments on: Moved static content to Cloud Files

By: Andrew

Andrew — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:37:59 +0000

Looks good, but doesnt seem your static content has been served compressed with either gzip or deflate, and none of your images, css, or js have been timestamped.

Is this an option in cloud files ? and if it isnt, is that because CDN is so fast and bandwidth so cheap that its not worth doing it ?

Also, can you do mod-rewrite to make it look as if the static content has come from your own servers ?

Cheers!

By: Trent

Trent — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:05:32 +0000

cool - doesnt look like the Rack has configs here in AU though

By: major

major — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:57:39 +0000

Good catch, Nicholas! I guess I should have moves the files to Cloud Files while I was more alert. I corrected it and the changes should be up shortly.

Thanks!

By: Nicholas Thompson

Nicholas Thompson — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:37:24 +0000

It appears, according to FireBug, that there are several missing files on page load.

I was reading up about Mosso - it looks like the containers for uploaded files dont actually support nested folders. The missing files according to FireBug are all in a folder called "i" (images I assume).

The Mosso CloudFiles looks very interesting though...